The IRS began its "Dirty Dozen" list for 2022, which includes potentially abusive arrangements that taxpayers should avoid. The tax scams in this series focus on four transactions that are wrongfully promoted and will likely attract additional agency compliance efforts in the future. Those four abusive transactions involve charitable remainder annuity trusts, Maltese individual retirement arrangements, foreign captive insurance and monetized installment sales. These are the first four entries in this year’s Dirty Dozen series.

The IRS began its "Dirty Dozen" list for 2022, which includes potentially abusive arrangements that taxpayers should avoid. The tax scams in this series focus on four transactions that are wrongfully promoted and will likely attract additional agency compliance efforts in the future. Those four abusive transactions involve charitable remainder annuity trusts, Maltese individual retirement arrangements, foreign captive insurance and monetized installment sales. These are the first four entries in this year’s Dirty Dozen series.

Taxpayers who have already claimed the purported tax benefits of one of these four transactions on a tax return should consider taking corrective steps, including filing an amended return and seeking independent advice. Where appropriate, the IRS will challenge the purported tax benefits from the transactions on this list and may assert accuracy-related penalties. Further, the IRS informed that to combat the evolving variety of these potentially abusive transactions, the IRS created the Office of Promoter Investigations (OPI). The IRS has a variety of means to find potentially abusive transactions, including examinations, promoter investigations, whistleblower claims, data analytics and reviewing marketing materials.

Further, the IRS reminded taxpayers to watch out for and avoid advertised schemes, many of which are now promoted online, that promise tax savings that are too good to be true and will likely cause taxpayers to legally compromise themselves. Additionally, the IRS informed that taxpayers who have engaged in any of these transactions or who are contemplating engaging in them should carefully review the underlying legal requirements and consult independent, competent advisors before claiming any purported tax benefits.

The IRS announced that is completing the processing on a key group of individual tax returns filed during 2021. Business paper returns filed in 2021 will follow shortly after. The Service began 2022 with a larger than usual inventory of paper tax returns and correspondence filed during 2021 due to the pandemic. The IRS will continue to work on the few remaining 2021 individual tax returns that have processing issues or require additional information from the taxpayer. As of June 10, the IRS had processed over 4.5 million individual paper tax returns received in 2021.

The IRS announced that is completing the processing on a key group of individual tax returns filed during 2021. Business paper returns filed in 2021 will follow shortly after. The Service began 2022 with a larger than usual inventory of paper tax returns and correspondence filed during 2021 due to the pandemic. The IRS will continue to work on the few remaining 2021 individual tax returns that have processing issues or require additional information from the taxpayer. As of June 10, the IRS had processed over 4.5 million individual paper tax returns received in 2021.

To date, more than twice as many returns await processing compared to a typical year at this point in the calendar year. A greater percentage of this year’s inventory awaiting processing is comprised of original returns that, generally, take less time to process than amended returns. To address the unprocessed inventory by the end of this year, the IRS has taken aggressive steps including significant, ongoing overtime for staff throughout 2022, creating special teams of employees focused solely on processing aged inventory and expediting hiring of thousands of new workers and contractors. Additionally, the IRS has improved the process for taxpayers whose paper and electronically filed returns were suspended during processing for manual review and correction.

The IRS reminded taxpayers who have not yet filed their 2021 tax returns this year, including those who requested an extension until October 17, to make sure they file their returns electronically with direct deposit to avoid delays. The IRS urged taxpayers to file as soon as they are ready and to not wait until the last minute before the October 17 extension deadline. Filing sooner avoids potential delays for taxpayers and assists the larger ongoing IRS efforts to complete processing tax returns this year.

Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Charles Rettig is pushing back on assertions that the agency is spending less time targeting wealthy taxpayers for audit in favor of lower income taxpayers.

Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Charles Rettig is pushing back on assertions that the agency is spending less time targeting wealthy taxpayers for audit in favor of lower income taxpayers.

"This is damaging to tax administration in this country when people say IRS audits more lower income people than higher income people," Rettig told attendees June 23, 2022, at the NYU Tax Controversy Forum.

He asserted that audit rate figures can be skewed depending on when the calculation is taking place. For example, he noted that if data is published on rates of audit for the 2021 tax year in 2022, the numbers will be considerably off.

"[W]hen you see these audit rates, don't jump on that train and say IRS is only auditing .0000 something," he said. "I go, Wow. Who are these folks we picked up? Right? The average audit gets picked up, particularly for high wealth taxpayer at least 16 months after that return has been filed. Why would we audit in the same calendar year that it's filed?"

Rettig noted that wealthy people may be filing later toward the extended filing deadline and filing more returns covering multiple years simultaneously, which would push back when audits take place. The would give the appearance that audits for more wealthy taxpayers may not be happening as much as for lower income taxpayers when examining a single-year audit rate.

But in reality, he said that audit rates for those who make more than $10 million "runs right around seven or eight percent. And as of this year, it’s at 8.7 percent. You will see that the $5 to $10 million group runs about 4.2%. You will see the $1 to $5 million group runs about 2.2%. Most of you have done the math and you understand exactly what I'm telling you, you go for the higher income folks."

After that, the numbers drop off "considerably," he said.

"The $1 million-and-under person is really the executive who has W-2 and 1099 income and we have that information," Rettig said. "The over $1 million person is the entrepreneur who has a lot of pass-through entities and whatnot, we don't have that information," and they get audited more because of it.

Rettig also used the forum to continue advocacy for more funding and guaranteed funding over multiple years to help improve not only enforcement, but to help improve the services that the agency provides to taxpayers, including hiring for call centers and providing better outreach.

Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee are the latest group to call on the Internal Revenue Service to implement 2-D barcoding technology on individual tax forms.

Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee are the latest group to call on the Internal Revenue Service to implement 2-D barcoding technology on individual tax forms.

"We are writing to strongly encourage the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to work with tax return software companies to implement 2-D barcoding technology for use during the 2023 tax filing season for the 1040 family of paper returns," the GOP senators, led by Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), said in a May 24, 2022, letter to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig.

Similar calls have been made by other stakeholders, including the National Taxpayer Advocate, who sent a directive to the IRS in March to implement 2-D barcoding in time for use with the 2023 tax season.

The GOP senators noted that the IRS is financially capable of doing this now. In the letter, the senators referenced the 2017 budget request of $8.4 million for implementation of 2-D barcoding and the $1 billion earmarked in the American Rescue Plan of 2021 for IT modernization, of which they state only $98.5 million so far has been spent.

The group also called on the agency to "stop chasing technological perfection" in the letter.

"If we were to wait for the promise of better technology, nothing would ever get implemented," the letter states. "To the contrary, the fact that 2-D technology is a bit older probably means it has been tested and is less expensive. Many states currently use 2-D barcoding for tax returns, so we have proof it works."

2-D barcoding came back into the forefront of needed IT upgrades for the IRS during the pandemic that caused a significant backlog of unprocessed paper returns. As of April 29, the agency still had more than 18 million unprocessed paper returns, though Commissioner Rettig has stated in numerous congressional hearings that the backlog will be back to its "normal" levels by the end of 2022.

The IRS Whistleblower Office has released the fiscal year (FY) 2021 annual report to Congress. In FY 2021, the Whistleblower Office made 179 award payments to whistleblowers totaling $36,144,926, including 20 awards paid under Code Sec. 7623(b). Whistleblower claim numbers assigned in FY 2021 grew by 55 percent year over year and claim closures increased by 13 percent. Additionally, this year’s report introduces the Code Sec. 7623 Payment and Claim Processing Analysis. The analysis shows Code Sec. 7623(b) awards were paid on average in 17 days.

The IRS Whistleblower Office has released the fiscal year (FY) 2021 annual report to Congress. In FY 2021, the Whistleblower Office made 179 award payments to whistleblowers totaling $36,144,926, including 20 awards paid under Code Sec. 7623(b). Whistleblower claim numbers assigned in FY 2021 grew by 55 percent year over year and claim closures increased by 13 percent. Additionally, this year’s report introduces the Code Sec. 7623 Payment and Claim Processing Analysis. The analysis shows Code Sec. 7623(b) awards were paid on average in 17 days.

Code Sec. 7623 Payment and Claim Processing Analysis

The average claim processing time for Code Sec. 7623(b) award payments made during FY 2021 increased by 2.9 percent from the prior year and average claim processing time for Code Sec. 7623(a) award payments increased by 10.4 percent. The report stated that it is likely average claim processing times will continue to increase as claim inventory continues to age while the Whistleblower Office awaits audits, exams, investigations, appeals, tech services, collection, statutes to expire, and whistleblower litigation.

Ten Most Common Allegations Submitted In FY 2021

The ten most common allegations submitted on Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information, for FY 2021 were:

• unreported income;
• general allegations of fraud, tax fraud, wire fraud, insurance fraud, and related allegations;
• false dependent exemptions;
• employee vs. subcontractor;
• failure to file;
• wage under reporter;
• capital gains tax;
• wages being paid in cash or under the table;
• rental income; and
• false deductions or expenses.

The report also provided other information including disclosures made under Taxpayer First Act, additional information on submissions received in FY 2021, information on claim numbers issued, claims remaining open and claims that were closed in each FY from 2019 to 2021, geographic location of all whistleblowers by region, open Code Sec. 7623(b) claims as of FY 2021, and reasons for closures that occurred during FY 2021.

Department of the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is continuing to promote the agreement on international taxes reached by most members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on a global corporate minimum tax, but acknowledged that its overall impact will be determined by the final details.

Department of the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is continuing to promote the agreement on international taxes reached by most members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on a global corporate minimum tax, but acknowledged that its overall impact will be determined by the final details.

Testifying before the Senate Finance Committee at a June 7, 2022, hearing about the White House’s fiscal 2023 budget request, Secretary Yellen noted in her opening remarks that she is "keenly focused on moving forward on the global agreement on international tax reform, including a global minimum tax that will level the playing field and raise crucial revenues to benefit people around the world."

However, she noted that because the specific details of how the international tax reforms will be defined and implemented, the impact on American businesses cannot be determined.

In response to a question as to whether the agency will provide Congress with the analysis of data currently available on whether the pillar one agreements will have a positive or negative impact, she said "that it could go either way, depending on the details which have not yet been decided. In the pillar one negotiations, the impact on fiscal revenues will be small."

Yellen continued: "Pillar two has a big impact. Pillar one will have a small impact. We're a very large market economy. We will gain revenue from our ability to tax foreign corporations that are doing business in the United States where we consume those services, we will lose some from revenue. Yet, it could be positive or negative, depending on details that have not yet been worked out. And that's why we've not provided data. We will when those details are clear."

That being said, Yellen also highlighted that countries will not be able to skirt the requirements of the treaty, responding to a question on whether China, a signee of the agreement, can be expected to comply with it when the nation has a questionable record complying with other international agreements.

Secretary Yellen testified that she expects China to comply with the terms of the agreement, but if it fails to do so, "this agreement contains an enforcement mechanism that will allow the United States or any other country that has adopted the global minimum tax to impose taxes on China's companies that would be the same as if China had complied. So there is a tough enforcement mechanism in this deal."

She also testified that Treasury will be negotiating on the details to ensure that business tax credits and subsidies will not negatively impact corporations once the international tax reforms are implemented.

Defending the Budget

During the hearing, she also addressed a number of issues that have become common themes among Biden Administration officials in recent months, including a recent focus on the tax gap and the disparities in auditing following a Government Accountability Office report that highlighted those concerns.

"Tackling that $600 billion annual tax gap is absolutely important in ensuring fiscal responsibility," Yellen told members of the Senate Finance Committee in response to a comment that the White House is requesting $80 billion over 10 years to address this. "It would generate substantial revenue in a manner that's efficient and fair. It would enable deficit reduction and help these price pressures by providing the funding a part of the funding we need for the urgent fiscal priorities."

She reinforced a common call to better fund the Internal Revenue Service to make sure it has the proper personnel in place to do things such as conducting more complicated audits to ensure the top earners are paying their fair share of taxes, in addition to helping the IRS serve the overall population and update its information technology infrastructure.

"We absolutely have to invest in the IRS to close that tax gap, which reflects opaque sources of income, mainly by high income earners that are not taxed," she said. "And they need the resources to serve taxpayers to be able to answer their phones to be able to ensure that they receive the payments that they are due, and they need to modernize their technology which is really the oldest dating back to the [19]60s in the federal government."

Yellen also took the opportunity to encourage Congress to extend the child tax credit, noting that while it may have played a minor role in contributing to the inflation issues the nation is tackling, it has had a significant effect on helping to reduce childhood hunger.

"It enabled families to get a little bit of breathing room and to help their kids afford nutritious food and clothing and back to school supplies." Yellen said.

She also mentioned during the Senate Finance Committee hearing that the Treasury Department is looking forward to working with Congress to get a tax deduction for union dues reinstated after it was cut in 2017.

A day later, on June 8, 2022, Secretary Yellen appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee in a hearing also advertised as a review of the White House budget but one that focused heavily on inflation, current energy policy, and international tax reform.

The American Institute of CPAs is calling on Congress to fund the Internal Revenue Service at the level requested by the White House in its fiscal year 2023 budget request. Separately, the group offered its suggestions on the IRS Guidance Priority List. "In advance of the Fiscal Year 2023 appropriations cycle, we request that you fund the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) at necessary levels to allow it to handle all the duties required of it by Congress, including properly administering and enforcing our nation’s tax laws as well as providing needed assistance to taxpayers and their advisers in a timely and professional manner," AICPA said in a May 25, 2022, letter to Democratic and Republican leadership in both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.

The American Institute of CPAs is calling on Congress to fund the Internal Revenue Service at the level requested by the White House in its fiscal year 2023 budget request. Separately, the group offered its suggestions on the IRS Guidance Priority List. "In advance of the Fiscal Year 2023 appropriations cycle, we request that you fund the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) at necessary levels to allow it to handle all the duties required of it by Congress, including properly administering and enforcing our nation’s tax laws as well as providing needed assistance to taxpayers and their advisers in a timely and professional manner," AICPA said in a May 25, 2022, letter to Democratic and Republican leadership in both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.

AICPA expressed concern that "service challenges will persist long after the pandemic has ended unless sufficient, targeted funding for technology improvements, human talent and training, and taxpayer services are appropriated."

The organization also noted that there needs to be more than money thrown at the agency to help its functioning. "It should be clear that funding alone will not solve the IRS’s problems,” AICPA wrote. “Structural reforms and organizational alignment from Congress, the President, the Secretary, and the Commissioner are necessary to delivering the promised goals. We look forward to working with all parties involved to this end and create an IRS that taxpayers deserve."

Priority Guidance Recommendations

In a separate letter sent to the IRS May 24, 2022, AICPA outlined its suggestions for the guidance that the agency should be prioritizing. The guidance recommendations cut across a range of programs and legislation, such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the SECURE Act, and the CARES Act and covering a number of areas such as corporation and shareholder taxation, employee benefits taxation, individual taxation, and international taxation.

R&E Recommendations

AICPA is also recommending the Internal Revenue Service issue specific regulations related to the treatment of research and experimental (R&E) expenditures under Sec. 174.

In a May 26, 2022, letter to the IRS, AICPA said that the Department of the Treasury and the IRS should "issue regulations providing that section 174(a) expenditures include direct costs, including employee compensation, contract labor, and materials, and at the taxpayer’s election, allocable indirect and overhead costs."

AICPA also said that Treasury and the IRS "should issue regulations that illustrate, using detailed examples, which costs are ‘incident to’ the development or improvement of a product as per Reg. §1.174-2."

If the agency doesn’t issue new regulations, AICPA recommended guidance to cover these requests.

Additionally, AICPA identified issues that have arisen with Rev. Proc. 2000-50, which covers the treatment of costs paid or incurred to develop, purchase, or lease computer software.

"IRS should modify the scope limitation under section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2000-50 to clarify that the limitation on costs that a taxpayer has treated as R&E expenditures under section 174 only applies to costs previously subject to an irrevocable election under section 174, including 174(b) or charging the expenses to capital account."

The Department of the Treasury is continuing its push to get funding for much needed information technology infrastructure upgrades from Congress.

The Department of the Treasury is continuing its push to get funding for much needed information technology infrastructure upgrades from Congress.

During a June 14, 2022, hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, Treasury Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo testified as to why the funds were needed.

The "IRS’ technology is decades out of date, written in a programming language no longer taught, and incredibly expensive to maintain the master file that under grids," Adeyemo told the committee in his opening statement. "The tax system dates back to the 1960s when there was no internet, no cell phones, and no spreadsheets or automatic payments."

The White House is requesting a 12 percent budget increase in fiscal year 2023 compared to 2022 enacted levels "to begin to remedy this mismatch between the IRS’ responsibilities and its resources."

Treasury’s request for increasing funds to help address IT infrastructure upgrades for the IRS did not come up during the hearing’s question-and-answer period, as the committee focused its attention on Russian sanctions, the role of using cryptocurrency to evade sanctions, energy policy and independence, and other criminal-focused activities.

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted a petition for certiorari in the case of A. Bittner, CA-5, 2021-2 USTC ¶50,242 . In Bittner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that each failure to report a qualifying foreign account on the annual Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) constituted a separate reporting violation subject to penalty. This means that the penalty applies on a per-account basis, not a per-form basis. The Fifth Circuit disagreed with a Ninth Circuit panel that adopted a per-form interpretation ( J. Boyd, CA-9, 2021-1 USTC ¶50,112).

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted a petition for certiorari in the case of A. Bittner, CA-5, 2021-2 USTC ¶50,242 . In Bittner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that each failure to report a qualifying foreign account on the annual Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) constituted a separate reporting violation subject to penalty. This means that the penalty applies on a per-account basis, not a per-form basis. The Fifth Circuit disagreed with a Ninth Circuit panel that adopted a per-form interpretation ( J. Boyd, CA-9, 2021-1 USTC ¶50,112).

—

Background

U.S. citizens and residents must keep records and/or file reports when the person makes a transaction or maintains a relation for any person with a foreign financial agency ( 31 USC 5314). Each person with a financial interest in a financial account in a foreign country must report the relationship to the IRS for each year the relationship exists by providing specified information on and filing the FBAR. The FBAR generally must be filed by June 30 of each calendar year for foreign financial accounts over $10,000 maintained during the previous calendar year (31 C.F.R. §§1010.350, 1010.306).

If the person fails to file the FBAR, the IRS can impose a penalty of up to $10,000 for non-willful violations, unless the violation was due to reasonable cause. For a willful violation, the maximum penalty is the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of (1) the amount of the transaction when a violation involves a transaction, or (2) the balance in the account at the time of the violation when a violation involves a failure to report the existence of an account. There is no reasonable cause exception for willful violations ( 31 USC 5321).

Fifth Circuit: FBAR Penalty Per Account

In A. Bittner, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the text, structure, history, and purpose of the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions showed that the "violation" of 31 USC 5314 contemplated by the 31 USC 5321 penalty was the failure to report a qualifying account, not the failure to file an FBAR. Therefore, the $10,000 penalty cap applied on a per-account basis, not a per-form basis.

The Fifth Circuit agreed with the government that the district court had erred in determining what constituted a "violation" under 31 USC 5314 by focusing on the regulations under section 5314 to the exclusion of section 5314 itself. Section 5314 does not create the obligation to file a single report, stated the Fifth Circuit, but instead gives the Treasury Secretary discretion to prescribe how to fulfill the statute’s requirement of reporting qualifying accounts.

The Fifth Circuit observed that by authorizing a penalty for any "violation of ... any provision of section 5314," as opposed to the regulations under section 5314, section 5314 "naturally reads" as referring to the statutory requirement to report each account, not the regulatory requirement to file FBARs in a particular manner. Further, the circuit court stated that the reasonable cause exception for non-willful violations was framed in terms of "the transaction" and "the account," and thus it also "naturally reads" as excusing the failure to report a transaction or account, not the failure to file an FBAR.

Ninth Circuit: FBAR Penalty Per Form

In J. Boyd, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the IRS can impose only one non-willful penalty when an untimely but accurate FBAR is filed, regardless of the number of foreign financial accounts. The Ninth Circuit determined that the statutory and regulatory scheme under 31 USC 5314 authorizes a single non-willful penalty for the failure to file a timely FBAR, and that the taxpayer’s conduct in failing to timely file the FBAR amounted to one non-willful violation.

The Ninth Circuit was not persuaded by the government's argument that, based on the statutory scheme as a whole and legislative intent, the penalty amount could be assessed on a per-account basis. The Ninth Circuit found nothing in the statute or regulations to suggest that the penalty could be calculated that way for a single failure to file a timely FBAR that is otherwise accurate. The Ninth Circuit presumed that Congress had purposely excluded the per-account language from the non-willful penalty provision because it had included such language in the previously-enacted willful penalty provision. Further, the inclusion of per-account language in the reasonable cause exception supported the view that Congress had intentionally omitted per-account language from the non-willful penalty provision.

2021 Individual Tax Return Preparation Engagement Letter

2021 Individual Tax Return Preparation Engagement Letter

We are pleased to confirm and specify the terms of our engagement with you and to clarify the nature and extent of the services we will provide regarding the preparation of the income tax return(s) and tax planning services. Please review, sign, and return to us with your tax documents.

Click Here to Download a copy of the Letter

• TAX STRATEGIES FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES
• INVESTMENT PLANNING
• TAX PLANNING FOR BUSINESS
• PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

• TAX STRATEGIES FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES
• INVESTMENT PLANNING
• TAX PLANNING FOR BUSINESS
• PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
• THE CURRENT 2020 TAX CLIMATE
• NATIVE MINIMUM TAX (AMT)
• TAX CREDITS & DEDUCTIONS
• EDUCATION STRATEGIES
• ESTIMATED TAX PAYMENTS
• TAXES FOR DOMESTIC HELP
• CHILDREN’S TAXES
• CHANGES TO EXEMPTIONS
• SUPPORTING YOUR PARENTS
• TAX STRATEGIES FOR HOMEOWNERS
• IRAs FOR KIDS
• TAXES & DIVORCE
• MANAGING RECEIPT OF INCOME
• YEAR END TAX PLANNING TIPS
• CAPITAL GAINS & LOSSES
• APPRECIATING INVESTMENTS
• OTHER CONSIDERATIONs
• PASSIVE ACTIVITIES
• MUTUAL FUNDS
• BONDS
• REAL ESTATE
• INVESTING IN SMALL BUSINESSES
• THE CARES ACT: $2 TRILLION STIMULUS PACKAGE INCLUDES SMALL BUSINESS LOAN RELIEF
• INVESTING IN SMALL BUSINESSES
• EMPLOYER-PROVIDED BENEFITS
• BUSINESS TAX CREDITS & DEDUCTIONS
• CHOOSING THE BEST INVENTORY METHOD
• BENEFITING FROM BUSINESS LOSSES
• DEDUCTIONS FOR MEALS, ENTERTAIN- MENT, AND TRANSPORTATION COSTS
• EMPLOYEE OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?
• RETIREMENT STRATEGIES
• ESTATE PLANNING

• INTRODUCTION
• 2020 MAY BE OUR LAST CHANCE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE TRADITIONAL  BUSINESS TAX BREAKS 
• HIGHLIGHTS OF SELECTED COVID-RELATED TAX PROVISIONS IMPACTING BUSINESSES
• SELECTED TAX CHANGES INCLUDED IN OTHER RECENT LEGISLATION
• TRADITIONAL YEAR-END TAX PLANNING TECHNIQUES  
•  FINAL COMMENTS                                   

2020 YEAR-END  INCOME TAX  PLANNING  FOR BUSINESSES

INTRODUCTION

It's that time of year when businesses normally start developing year-end planning strategies. However, there has never been a year quite like 2020. We think it is safe to say that year-end tax planning for 2020 is proving to be the trickiest in recent memory.  In response to the Coronavirus, Congress and the IRS have been exceedingly busy enacting and issuing never-seen-before tax relief for businesses and employers. Congress had little choice but to pass this complex legislation quickly, without time for adequate review. Consequently, as one would expect, there continues to be significant uncertainty on the application and implementation of many of the most important provisions in this legislation. In addition, Congress may not be through as it continues to struggle with attempts to enact even more Coronavirus relief legislation before the end of the year. Moreover, for well over a decade, we have been faced with the off-and-on expiration of a long list of popular business tax breaks. Historically, Congress has temporarily extended the majority of these tax breaks every few years. Unfortunately, several of these traditional tax breaks are currently scheduled to expire after the end of 2020.

We are sending this letter to help bring you up-to-date on the most significant tax provisions that could impact year-end planning for businesses. We start this letter with a listing of selected historic business tax breaks scheduled to expire at the end of 2020. We then discuss selected COVID­ related tax provisions that are most likely to impact businesses. We conclude this letter by highlighting certain time-honored, year-end tax planning techniques many businesses should consider notwithstanding the uncertain times we are currently experiencing.

Caution! It is entirely possible that Congress could enact additional COVID-related tax legislation before the end of this year. In addition, the IRS continues releasing guidance on various important tax provisions (particularly on COVID-related tax provisions that have already been enacted). We closely monitor new tax legislation and IRS releases on an ongoing basis. Please call our firm if you want an update on the latest tax legislation IRS notifications, announcem.ents, and guidance or if you need additional information concerning any item discussed in this letter.

Be careful! Although this letter contains planning ideas, you cannot properly evaluate a particular planning strategy without calculating the overall tax liability for the business and its owners (including the alternative minimum tax) with and without the strategy. Inaddition, this letter contains ideas for Federal income tax planning only. State income tax issues are not addressed. However, you should consider the state income tax impact of a particular planning strategy. We recommend that you call our Firm before implementing any tax planning technique discussed in this letter, or if you need more information concerning anything discussed.

2020 MAY BE OUR LAST CHANCE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE                                                                              TRADITIONAL  BUSINESS TAX BREAKS

For well over a decade, we have been faced with the off-and-on expiration of a long list of popular tax breaks for businesses. Historically, Congress has temporarily extended the majority of these tax breaks every few years. However, several of these tax breaks for businesses are scheduled to expire at the end of 2020, and Congress has yet to extend them. Some of the more popular business tax breaks scheduled to expire at the end of 2020 include: Deductions for qualified improvements to certain energy-efficient commercial buildings; Credit of up to $2,000 for construction of qualified energy-efficient new homes; 7-year depreciation period for certain motor sports racetrack property; Employer credit for payments for qualified family and medical leave; 3-year depreciation period for certain race horses; and the Work Opportunity Credit for hiring workers from certain disadvantaged groups. Please note as we send this letter, it has been reported that some members of Congress are still pushing for these tax breaks to be extended beyond 2020. However, only time will tell whether they will be extended.  Planning Alert! In addition to these traditional expiring tax breaks, the COVID-inspired CARES Act (discussed in more detail below) also contains certain tax breaks scheduled to expire after 2020. For example, the 50% employee retention credit of up to $5,000 per employee is effective for qualified wages paid after March 12, 2020 and before January 1, 2021. Caution! Although not expiring, the current 26% business tax credit for Qualified Solar Energy Property, Fiber-Optic Solar Property, Qualified Fuel Cell Property and Qualified Small Wind Energy Property is reduced to 22% for qualified property where the construction of the property begins after 2020 and before 2022. Thus, to qualify for the full 26% credit (instead of next year’s 22% credit), construction of the qualifying energy-efficient property must begin no later than December 31, 2020.

HIGHLIGHTS OF SELECTED COVID-RELATED TAX PROVISIONS IMPACTING BUSINESSES

Largely in response to government-mandated shutdowns caused by COVID-19 (COVID), Congress enacted a series of tax- relief measures for businesses, including: The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“Families First Act”) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). It is well beyond the scope of this letter to provide you a detailed discussion of the many business tax relief provisions contained in this voluminous legislation. Instead, the following are selected highlights that could have an impact on your business tax planning. Caution! Congress passed most of this recent COVID-Related legislation in a hurried fashion, without time to address the many uncertainties that would inevitably arise. As a result, over the last several months, we have experienced a stream of piecemeal guidance from the IRS and Small Business Administration (SBA) attempting to respond to some of these uncertainties. As we finish this letter, we are still waiting for guidance on many unanswered questions. Our firm continues to monitor the developments in this area, so please call our firm if you need additional information regarding any of the provisions listed below.

Paycheck Protection Program Loans (PPP Loans). This program was intended to provide struggling businesses with a quick infusion of cash to stay afloat and to retain employees in the midst of government-mandated shutdowns. The initial cash outlay was in the form of a PPP Loan, with a potential for all or a portion of the loan to be forgiven if the borrower could establish that the borrowed funds were used for certain qualifying business expenditures (i.e., generally payroll, rent, utilities, and mortgage payments) during a designated 8-week or 24-week “Covered Period.” As we send this letter, the PPP Loan program stopped accepting loan applications on August 8, 2020 (although there are legislative proposals to extend that deadline). The SBA reported that there have been more than 5.2 million PPP Loans made aggregating approximately $525 billion in total. Planning Alert! Most PPP Loan borrowers are now struggling with how and when they should apply to the lender for their PPP Loan forgiveness. There are continued uncertainties regarding the PPP Loan forgiveness process, and we are hoping for additional guidance in the near future. As we wait for that guidance, here are a few things you should know:

• No Defined Deadline For Submitting PPP Loan Forgiveness There is currently no deadline for submitting a PPP Loan Forgiveness Application. Generally, payments (if any) are not due on a PPP Loan until the SBA remits the PPP Loan’s forgiveness amount (if any) to the initial lender of the PPP Loan. However, if the borrower fails to apply for loan forgiveness within 10 months of the end of the borrower’s 8-week or 24-week covered period, payments of principal and interest on the PPP Loan must begin at the end of that 10-month period.

• Deductibility Of Expenses Related To The PPP Loan Forgiveness Even though the CARES Act provides that forgiveness of a PPP Loan is tax free, the IRS is currently taking the position that no tax deduction will be allowed for an expense, if the payment of that expense results in the forgiveness of a PPP Loan amount. As we complete this letter, there is significant pressure from business and professional groups urging the IRS to allow such deductions, or for Congress to pass legislation that would allow the deductions. Please contact our firm if you want a status report on this issue.

• Expedited Forgiveness Procedures For Smaller PPP The procedures for gathering documentation and applying for PPP Loan forgiveness could be tedious and time consuming. Planning Alert! In early October, the IRS and the SBA released a new “simplified” PPP Loan forgiveness Application Form that can be used only by borrowers that received a

PPP Loan of $50,000 or less. This should significantly simplify the PPP Loan Forgiveness process for those qualifying borrowers who borrowed $50,000 or less. Caution! Certain members of Congress are currently promoting legislation that, if passed, could also substantially streamline the loan forgiveness process for PPP Loans under a certain dollar threshold that could turn out to be higher than $50,000. As we complete this letter, the chance of this type of legislation being enacted is uncertain.

Employment-Related Payroll Tax Credits, Deferrals, Etc. Last Spring, in addition to the PPP Loan provision, Congress passed a dizzying array of tax relief provisions designed to subsidize qualifying employers for keeping employees on their payroll, and to provide additional liquidity for their businesses. These tax relief provisions include: Refundable employer tax credits of up to 100% of the qualifying Sick Leave And Family Leave Payments made to qualifying employees; Refundable income tax credits for self-employed individuals with respect to their “Family Leave and Sick Leave Equivalent Amounts;” Refundable 50% Employee Retention Credit for qualifying wages paid by certain employers experiencing business closure or economic hardship due to COVID; and, Deferral of deposits for the 6.2% portion of employer payroll taxes (can also apply to the 6.2% portion of S/E Tax). Planning Alert! It is well beyond the scope of this letter to provide a detailed discussion of the various technical requirements a business must satisfy to qualify for and claim these benefits. However, if you think your business may qualify for any of these tax benefits, feel free to call our firm. We will be glad to review your particular situation and advise you whether your business qualifies.

Temporary Relief For Net Operating Losses (NOLs). Before the Tax Cuts And Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), net operating losses (NOLs) could generally be carried back two prior years, and carried forward for 20 years. TCJA generally repealed the 2-year carried back period for NOLs (except for NOLs attributable to certain farming businesses and certain property and casualty insurance companies), and allowed NOLs to be carried forward indefinitely. TCJA also limited the deduction for NOL carryforwards to 80% of the taxable income for the carryover year. The CARES Act generally provides the following temporary relief with respect to NOLs: 1) Allows NOLs arising in tax years beginning after 2017 and before 2021 (e.g., NOLs arising in calendar years 2018, 2019, or 2020 for calendar-year taxpayers) to be carried back to 5 preceding years; and 2) Removes the 80% of taxable income limit for the NOL deduction for any tax year beginning before 2021. Planning Alert! A taxpayer may elect to forego the carryback of an NOL. Generally, the election to forego the NOL carryback must be made by the due date (including extensions) for the year of the NOL. The CARES Act provides that the election to forego the 5-year NOL carryback for tax years beginning in 2018 or 2019, may be made by the due date (including extensions) of the taxpayer’s return for the first taxable year ending after March 27, 2020.

Temporary Increase Of Limit On Business Interest Expense From 30% To 50% Of ATI. Effective for tax years beginning after 2017, TCJA generally limited the amount of business interest expense in excess of business interest income allowed as a deduction to 30% of Adjusted Taxable Income (ATI). Businesses with average gross receipts for the preceding three years of $25 million ($26 million for 2020) or less are generally exempt from this limit. The CARES Act makes the following changes:

• Increases the limit from 30% to 50% of ATI (unless the taxpayer elects otherwise) for tax years beginning in 2019 and 2020;
• Allows a taxpayer to use its “2019” ATI for purposes of determining the amount of the 50% of ATI limit for “2020”; 3) For partnerships, the 30% of ATI limit remains in place for 2019 but is 50% for 2020; and 4) Unless a partner elects otherwise, 50% of a partnership’s “excess business interest” allocated to a partner in 2019 is fully deductible by the partner in 2020 and not subject to the 50% ATI limitation (the remaining 50% of excess business interest from 2019 allocated to the partner is subject to the regular ATI limitations for 2020 and subsequent years).

Retroactive Fix For Computing Depreciation For “Qualified Improvement Property.” The CARES Act finally corrected the depreciation “glitch” contained in TCJA with respect to “Qualified Improvement Property.” Qualified Improvement Property (QIP) is generally defined as “an improvement” to the interior portion of a commercial building (provided the improvement is not attributable to an enlargement of the building, elevators or escalators, or the internal structural framework of the building), if the improvement is placed in service “after” the building was first placed in service. Due to a drafting error in TCJA, QIP was assigned a depreciable life of 39 years, instead of the intended 15 year life. To compound the error, assigning QIP a depreciable life of 39 years (instead of 15 years) also disqualified QIP for the 100% 168(k) first-year bonus depreciation, because 168(k) property must have a depreciable life of 20 years or less. The CARES Act fixes this mistake retroactively by assigning a 15-year depreciable life for all QIP that was placed in service after 2017. Therefore, QIP placed in service in 2018 or 2019 retroactively qualifies for the 100% 168(k) bonus depreciation. Tax Tip! This is great news for taxpayers that have previously capitalized post-2017 remodeling costs for existing restaurants, retail stores, and office buildings. So long as the qualifying improvements to the remodeled property was placed in service after 2017, the capitalized remodeling should now qualify for a 100% write off under 168(k). Planning Alert! Recently-issued final 168(k) regulations confirm that a purchaser of an existing commercial building containing QIP made by a previous owner, will not be able to treat any portion of the building’s purchase price as QIP.

• Claiming The 100% 168(k) Depreciation For QIP Placed In Service In 2018 Or The IRS says that we generally have two options to recoup the unclaimed 100% depreciation deduction for QIP placed in service in 2018 or 2019. First,

we can amend the 2018 or 2019 return and claim the 100% depreciation deduction on the amended return. If we choose to amend the 2018 return, the IRS says that we must file the amended 2018 return no later than October 15, 2021. Second, we could recoup the 100% 168(k) depreciation by claiming it through an automatic accounting method change in a subsequent year. For example, by filing an automatic accounting method change, you could claim the 100% deduction on your 2020 return (or even a later return). Planning Alert! If the QIP was placed in service in 2018 or 2019 by a partnership subject to the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime, our options for recouping the 100% depreciation deduction are more limited. We can either: 1) File for an “Administrative Adjustment Request” (AAR) under the new “Centralized Partnership Audit Regime” for the current tax year, or 2) File for an automatic accounting method change.

SELECTED TAX CHANGES INCLUDED IN OTHER RECENT LEGISLATION

Recent Legislation Extends The Due Date For Establishing A New Retirement Plan. Before the passage of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020 (the “Appropriations Act”), calendar-year taxpayers wishing to establish a new qualified retirement plan for a tax year generally had to adopt the plan by December 31st of that year. However, a SEP could be established by the due date of the tax return (including extensions), but a SIMPLE plan was required to be established by October 1st of that year. Effective for plans adopted for taxable years beginning after 2019, the Appropriations Act generally allows the adoption of a stock bonus, pension, profit-sharing, or annuity plan for a taxable year after the close of the taxable year as long as the plan is adopted by the due date of the employer’s tax return, including extensions. Caution! The IRS says that a SIMPLE plan must still be adopted for an existing business with an effective date no later than October 1st of the year. Moreover, the Committee Reports to the Act say this new extended adoption date does not override rules requiring certain plan provisions to be in effect during a plan year, such as the provision for elective deferrals under a qualified cash or deferral arrangement (also known as a 401(k) plan).

Retroactive Repeal UBIT Imposed On Tax-Exempt Organizations That Provide Employee Parking. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), a tax-exempt organization’s unrelated business taxable income was increased by amounts paid or incurred by the organization to provide employee parking. This provision was effective for amounts paid or incurred after 2017. Recent legislation repealed this provision retroactively, effective for amounts paid or incurred after 2017. Planning Alert! Tax-exempt organizations that previously paid unrelated business income tax on expenses for qualified transportation fringe benefits, including employee parking, may now claim a refund. To do so, they should file an amended Form 990-T within the time allowed for refunds. More information on this process can be found at “How To Claim a Refund or Credit of Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) or adjust Form 990-T for Qualified Transportation Fringe Amounts” at the IRS website.

Don’t Overlook Simplified Accounting Methods For Certain Small Businesses. Although not part of the recent COVID- related tax legislation, its important to be aware that the Tax Cuts And Jobs Act (enacted in late 2017) provides for the following accounting method relief for businesses with Average Gross Receipts (AGRs) for the Preceding Three Tax Years of $26 Million or Less for 2020: 1) Generally allows businesses to use the cash method of accounting even if the business has inventories, 2) Allows simplified methods for accounting for inventories, 3) Exempts businesses from applying UNICAP, and

4) Liberalizes the availability of the completed-contract method. Planning Alert! The IRS has released detailed procedures to follow for taxpayers who qualify and wish to change their accounting methods in light of these new relief provisions. Please call our firm if you want us to help you determine whether any of these simplified accounting methods might be available to your business.

TRADITIONAL YEAR-END TAX PLANNING TECHNIQUES  

Pay Special Attention to “Timing” Issues! From a tax-planning standpoint, 2020 has been anything but a “normal” year for many businesses. The coronavirus has caused many businesses to incur an unprecedented loss of revenues during 2020, combined with unexpected additional costs. While at the same time, some business sectors have actually flourished during this difficult time. Consequently, for 2020, there is clearly no single year-end tax planning strategy that will necessarily apply to all (or even a majority) of businesses. Planning Alert! In normal times, a traditional year-end tax planning strategy for businesses would include reducing current year taxable income by deferring taxable income into later years and accelerating deductions into the current year. This strategy has been particularly beneficial where the income tax rate on the business’s income in the following year is expected to be the same or lower than the current year. For businesses that have done well during the COVID crisis, this strategy would still generally be advisable. However, for businesses that expect their taxable income to be much lower in 2020 than in 2021, the opposite strategy might be more advisable. Caution! As we discuss the planning methods that involve the “timing” of income or deductions, please keep in mind that you might want to consider taking the precise opposite steps recommended, if you decide it would be better to defer deductions into 2021, while accelerating income into 2020. Moreover, the relatively new 20% 199A deduction that was first available in 2018 adds another wrinkle to deciding whether to defer or accelerate revenues, and/or to defer or accelerate deductions. As discussed in more detail below, your ability to take maximum advantage of the 20% 199A deduction for 2020 and/or 2021 may, in certain situations, be

enhanced significantly if you are able to keep your taxable income below certain thresholds. Consequently, please keep that factor in mind as you read through the following timing strategies for income and deductions.

Planning With The First-Year 168(k) Bonus Depreciation Deduction. Traditionally, a popular way for businesses to maximize current-year deductions has been to take advantage of the First-Year 168(k) Bonus Depreciation Deduction. Before the “Tax Cuts And Jobs Act” (TCJA) which was enacted in late 2017, the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction was equal to 50% of the cost of qualifying “new” depreciable assets placed in service. TCJA temporarily increased the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction to 100% for qualifying property acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023. TCJA further enhanced the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction by making the following changes:

• “Used” Property Temporarily Qualifies For 168(k) Bonus Before TCJA, only “new” qualifying property was eligible for the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction. For qualifying property acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before 2027, the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation may be taken on “new” or “used” property. Therefore, property that generally qualifies for the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation includes “new” or “used” business property that has a depreciable life for tax purposes of 20 years or less (e.g., machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, sidewalks, roads, landscaping, computers, computer software, farm buildings, and qualified motor fuels facilities). Caution! As discussed previously, a purchaser of an existing commercial building containing QIP made by a previous owner, will not be able to treat any portion of the building’s purchase price as QIP. Planning Alert! The expansion of the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation to “used” property has expanded planning opportunities, including: 1) A lessee that currently leases qualifying 168(k) property (e.g., leased equipment) from an unrelated lessor, could later purchase the property from the lessor and qualify for the 100% 168(k) Bonus Depreciation; 2) Taxpayers that purchase the operating assets of another operating business will be able to deduct 100% of the purchase price that is properly allocated to 168(k) assets (other than QIP) of the target business; and 3) The IRS says that a person who buys a partnership interest from an unrelated selling partner may be entitled to the 100% 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction with respect to a certain portion of the purchase price of the partnership interest, if the partnership owns existing qualifying 168(k) property.

• The 100% 168(k) Bonus Depreciation Deduction For “Used” Property Generally Makes Cost Segregation Studies More Depreciable components of a building that are properly classified as depreciable personal property under a cost segregation study are generally depreciated over 5 to 7 years. Before TCJA, these depreciable building components for a purchaser of a “used” building generally qualified for the 179 Deduction (subject to the dollar caps), but did not qualify for a 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction because the 168(k) depreciation deduction only applied to “new” property. However, after TCJA, the depreciable components of a building that are properly classified as “personal property” (as opposed to “real property”) will qualify for the 100% 168(k) Bonus Depreciation (whether new or used).

• Annual Depreciation Caps For Passenger Vehicles Vehicles used primarily in business generally qualify for the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation. However, there is a dollar cap imposed on business cars, and also on trucks, vans, and SUVs that have a loaded vehicle weight of 6,000 lbs or less. This dollar cap was increased significantly under TCJA. More specifically, for qualifying vehicles placed in service in 2020 and used 100% for business, the annual depreciation caps are as follows: 1st year - $10,100; 2nd year - $16,100; 3rd year - $9,700; fourth and subsequent years - $5,760. Moreover, if the vehicle (new or used) otherwise qualifies for the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation, the first year depreciation cap (assuming 100% business use) is increased by $8,000 (i.e., from $10,100 to $18,100 for 2020). Thus, a vehicle otherwise qualifying for the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction with loaded Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) of 6,000 lbs or less used exclusively for business and placed in service in 2020 would be entitled to a depreciation deduction for 2020 of up to $18,100, whether purchased new or used. If the vehicle continues to be used exclusively for business during the second year (i.e., during 2021), it would be entitled to a second-year depreciation deduction of up to $16,100. Planning Alert! Even better, if the same new or used business vehicle (which is used 100% for business) has a loaded GVW over 6,000 lbs, 100% of its cost (without a dollar cap) could be deducted in 2020 as a 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction. Caution! When taking the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation on your business vehicle (and whether or not it weighs more than 6,000 lbs), if your business-use percentage drops to 50% or below in a later year, you will generally be required to bring into income a portion of the deduction taken in the first year.

• 168(k) Bonus Depreciation Taken In Tax Year Qualifying Property Is “Placed In ” The 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction is taken in the tax year the qualifying property is “placed in service.” Consequently, if your business anticipates acquiring qualifying 168(k) property between now and the end of the year, the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction is taken in 2020 if the property is placed in service no later than December 31, 2020. Alternatively, the 168(k) Bonus Depreciation deduction can be deferred until 2021 if the qualifying property is placed in service in 2021. Generally, if you are purchasing “personal property” (equipment, computer, vehicles, etc.), “placed in service” means the property is ready and available for use (this commonly means the date on which the property has been set up and tested). If you

are dealing with building improvements (e.g., “Qualified Improvement Property”), the date on the Certificate of Occupancy is commonly considered the date the qualifying building improvements are placed in service.

Un-Reimbursed Employee Business Expenses Are Not Deductible! For 2018 through 2025, “un-reimbursed” employee business expenses are not deductible at all by an employee. Good News! Generally, employee business expenses that are reimbursed under an employer’s qualified “Accountable Reimbursement Arrangement” are deductible by the employer (subject to the 50% limit on business meals), and the reimbursements are not taxable to the employee. However, reimbursements under an arrangement that is not a qualified “Accountable Reimbursement Arrangement” generally must be treated as compensation and included in the employee’s W-2, and the employer would get no offsetting deduction for the business expense. Planning Alert! Generally, for a reimbursement arrangement to qualify as an “Accountable Reimbursement Arrangement” - 1) The employer must maintain a reimbursement arrangement that requires the employee to substantiate covered expenses, 2) The reimbursement arrangement must require the return of amounts paid to the employee that are in excess of the amounts substantiated, and 3) There must be a business connection between the reimbursement (or advance) and anticipated business expenses.

Restrictions On Deducting Entertainment Expenses. Generally, business expenditures with respect to an entertainment, amusement or recreation activity are not deductible after 2017. Planning Alert! Fortunately, the IRS has announced that taxpayers can still generally deduct 50% of the cost of meals with a business associate (e.g., a current or potential business customer, client, supplier, employee, agent, partner, professional advisor). In addition, the IRS stated that a taxpayer could deduct 50% of the cost of food and beverages provided during a nondeductible entertainment activity with a business associate provided the food and beverages are purchased separately from the entertainment, or the cost of the food and beverages is stated separately from the cost of the entertainment on one or more bills, invoices, or receipts. Caution! If an employer reimburses an employee’s deductible business meal and beverage expense under an Accountable Reimbursement Arrangement, the employer could deduct 50% of the reimbursement. However, as discussed previously, an employee who is not reimbursed by the employer for the business meal would get no deduction because un-reimbursed employee business expenses are not deductible (from 2018 through 2025).

S Corporation Shareholders Should Check Stock And Debt Basis Before Year-End. If you own S corporation stock and you think your S corporation will have a tax loss this year, you should contact us as soon as possible. These losses will not be deductible on your personal return unless and until you have adequate “basis” in your S corporation. Any pass-through loss that exceeds your “basis” in the S corporation will carry over to succeeding years. You have basis to the extent of the amounts paid for your stock (adjusted for net pass-through income, losses, and distributions), plus any amounts you have personally loaned to your S corporation. Caution! A shareholder cannot get debt basis by merely guaranteeing a third-party loan to the S corporation. Please do not attempt to restructure your loans without contacting us first.

Deductions For Business Expenses Paid By Partners May Be Limited. Historically, the IRS has ruled that a partner may deduct business expenses paid on behalf of the partnership only if there is an agreement (preferably in writing) between the partner and the partnership providing that those expenses are to be paid by the partner, and that the expenses will not be reimbursed by the partnership. Tax Tip. If you are a partner paying unreimbursed expenses on behalf of your partnership, to be safe, you should have a written agreement with the partnership providing that those expenses are to be paid by you, and that the expenses will not be reimbursed by the partnership.

Maximize Your 20% 199A Deduction For “Qualified Business Income” (QBI). First effective in 2018, the 20% 199A Deduction has had a major impact on businesses. This provision allows qualified taxpayers to take a 20% Deduction with respect to “Qualified Business Income,” “Qualified REIT Dividends,” and “Publically-Traded Partnership Income.” Based on 2018 and 2019 tax filings, of these three types of qualifying income, “Qualified Business Income” (QBI) has had the biggest impact by far on the greatest number of taxpayers. Consequently, this discussion of the 20% 199A Deduction focuses primarily on “Qualified Business Income” (QBI). Planning Alert! As many of you discovered with your 2018 and 2019 returns, if you own an interest in a business as a sole proprietor, an S corporation shareholder, or a partner in a partnership, you are a very good candidate for the 20% 199A Deduction with respect to QBI. Unfortunately, it is not feasible to provide a thorough discussion of the 20% 199A Deduction for Qualified Business Income (QBI) in this letter. However, the following are selected highlights that could be particularly helpful for year-end planning:

• W-2 Wage And Capital Limitation On The Amount Of The 20% Of QBI Generally, the amount of your 20% of QBI Deduction with respect to each Qualified Trade or Business may not exceed the greater of: 1) 50% of the allocable share of the business’s W-2 wages allocated to the QBI of each “Qualified Trade or Business,” or 2) The sum of 25% of your allocable share of W-2 wages with respect to each “Qualified Trade or Business,” plus 2.5% of your allocable share of unadjusted basis of tangible depreciable property held by the business at the close of the taxable year. Planning Alert! For 2020, an otherwise qualifying taxpayer is entirely exempt from the W-2 Wage And Capital Limitation if the

Taxpayer’s “Taxable Income” (computed without regard to the 20% 199A Deduction) is $163,300 or below ($326,600 or below if married filing jointly). Caution! For 2020, the Wage and Capital Limitation phases in ratably as a taxpayer’s Taxable Income goes from more than $163,300 to $213,300, or from more than $326,600 to $426,600 (if filing jointly).

• Business Income From “Specified Service Trade Or Businesses” (SSTBs) Does Not Qualify For The 20% 199A Deduction For Owners Who Have “Taxable Income” Above Certain Based on your “Taxable Income” (before the 20% 199A Deduction), all or a portion of your qualified business income from a so-called “Specified Service Trade or Business” (i.e., certain service-type operations in various professional fields such as law, medicine, accounting, consulting, etc.) may not qualify for the 20% 199A Deduction. More specifically, if your “Taxable Income” for 2020 (before the 20% 199A Deduction) is $163,300 or below ($326,600 or below if married filing jointly), “all” of the qualified business income from your “Specified Service Trade or Business” (SSTB) is eligible for the 20% 199A deduction. However, if for 2020 your “Taxable Income” is $213,300 or more ($426,600 or more if married filing jointly), “none” of your SSTB income qualifies for the 20% 199A Deduction. Caution! If for 2020, your “Taxable Income” is between $163,300 and $213,300 (between $326,600 and $426,600 if married filing jointly), only “a portion” of your SSTB income will be eligible for the 20% 199A Deduction.

• Planning Alert! A taxpayer with Taxable Income for 2020 of $163,300 or less ($326,600 or less if married filing jointly)

qualifies for two major benefits: 1) The taxpayer’s SSTB income (if any) is fully eligible for the 20% 199A deduction, and

2) The taxpayer is completely exempt from the W-2 Wage and Capital Limitation. Consequently, if you are in a situation where your 20% 199A Deduction would otherwise be significantly reduced (or even eliminated altogether) due to either or both of these limitations, it is even more important that you consider year-end strategies that could help you reduce your 2020 taxable income (before the 20% 199A Deduction) to or below the $163,300/$326,600 thresholds.

• Evaluating Reasonable W-2 Compensation Levels Paid To S Corp Owners/Employees Is More Important Than Ever! Even before the 20% 199A Deduction provision was enacted, S corporation shareholder/employees have had an incentive to pay themselves W-2 wages as low as possible because only the shareholder’s W-2 income from the S corporation is subject to FICA Other income of the shareholder from the S corporation is generally not subject to FICA or Self-Employment (S/E) taxes. Traditionally, where the IRS has determined that an S corporation shareholder/employee has taken unreasonably “low” compensation from the S corporation, the IRS has argued that other amounts the shareholder has received from the S corporation (e.g., distributions) are disguised “compensation” and should be subject to FICA taxes. In light of the 20% 199A Deduction, reviewing the W-2 wage level for Shareholder/Employees of S Corporations becomes even more important. For example, for S Corporation shareholder/employees who expect to have 2020 Taxable Income (before the 20% 199A Deduction) of $163,300 or less ($326,600 or less if married filing jointly), in order to maximize their potential 20% 199A Deduction there is a tax incentive to keep the shareholders’ W-2 wages as “low” as possible, because: 1) The W-2 Wages paid to shareholders do not qualify for the 20%199A Deduction, but the W-2 Wages do reduce a shareholder’s pass-through Qualified Business Income, 2) The shareholder will be exempt from the W-2 Wage and Capital Limitation (so lower W-2 wages will not limit the shareholder’s potential 20% 199A Deduction amount), and 3) The shareholder’s pass-through SSTB income (if any) will be fully eligible for the 20% 199A Deduction, while W-2 wages paid to the shareholder/employee will not qualify. Caution! The IRS has a long history of attacking S Corporations that it believes are paying shareholder/employees unreasonably low W-2 wages. Planning Alert! If you want our Firm to review the W-2 wages that your S corporation is currently paying to its shareholders in light of this 20% 199A Deduction, please contact us as soon as possible. The quicker you contact us on this issue, the better chance you have to take steps before the end of 2020 to increase your 20% deduction.

 FINAL COMMENTS

Please contact us if you are interested in a tax topic that we did not discuss. Tax law is constantly changing due to new legislation, cases, regulations, and IRS rulings. Our Firm closely monitors these changes. In addition, please call us before implementing any planning idea discussed in this letter, or if you need additional information concerning any item mentioned in this letter. We will gladly assist you. Note! The information contained in this material should not be relied upon without an independent, professional analysis of how any of the items discussed may apply to a specific situation.

Disclaimer: Any tax advice contained in the body of this material was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. The preceding information is intended as a general discussion of the subject addressed and is not intended as a formal tax opinion. The recipient should not rely on any information contained herein without performing his or her own research verifying the conclusions reached. The conclusions reached should not be relied upon without an independent, professional analysis of the facts and law applicable to the situation.

• INTRODUCTION
• 2020 MAY BE OUR LAST CHANCE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE TRADITIONAL TAX BREAKS
• HIGHLIGHTS OF RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
• HIGHLIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL YEAR-END TAX PLANNING TECHNIQUES
  
  

 2020 YEAR-END  INCOME TAX PLANNING  FOR  INDIVIDUALS

INTRODUCTION

 With year-end approaching, this is the time of year we suggest possible year-end tax strategies for our clients. However, there has never been a year quite like 2020. We think it is safe to say that year-end tax planning for 2020 is proving to be the trickiest in recent memory. In response to the Coronavirus, Congress and the IRS have been exceedingly busy enacting and issuing never-seen­ before tax relief. Many of these new tax relief provisions are temporary, and expire after 2020. Moreover, for well over a decade, we have been faced with the off-and-on expiration of a long list of popular tax breaks. Historically, Congress has temporarily extended the majority of these tax breaks every few years. Unfortunately, several of these traditional tax breaks are currently scheduled to expire after the end of 2020.

 This letter is designed to bring you up-to-date on the most significant tax provisions that could impact your year-end planning. We start this letter with a listing of selected historic tax breaks scheduled to expire at the end of 2020. We then discuss selected legislative changes (including COVID-related tax provisions) that are most likely to impact your year-end tax planning. We conclude this letter by highlighting certain time-honored, year-end tax planning techniques that remain relevant notwithstanding the recent COVID-related tax changes.

 Caution! It is entirely possible that Congress could enact additional COVID-related tax legislation before the end of this year. In addition, the IRS continues releasing guidance on various important tax provisions (particularly on COVID-related tax provisions that have already been enacted). We closely monitor new tax legislation and IRS releases on an ongoing basis. Please call our firm if you want an update on the latest tax legislation IRS notifications, announcements, and guidance or if you need additional information concerning any item discussed in this letter.

 Be Careful! We suggest you call our firm before implementing any tax planning technique discussed in this letter. You cannot properly evaluate a particular planning strategy without calculating your overall tax liability with and without that strategy. This letter contains ideas for Federal income tax planning only. State income tax issues are not addressed.

 2020 MAY BE OUR LAST CHANCE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE TRADITIONAL TAX BREAKS

For well over a decade, we have been faced with the off-and-on expiration of a long list of popular tax breaks. Historically, Congress has temporarily extended the majority of these tax breaks every few years. However, several popular tax breaks for individuals are scheduled to expire at the end of 2020, and Congress has yet to extend them. Some of the more popular tax breaks scheduled to expire at the end of 2020 include: Deduction (up to $4,000) for Qualified Higher Education Expenses; Deduction for Mortgage Insurance Premiums as Qualified Residence Interest; Income Exclusion For Discharge Of Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness; and the 10% Credit (with a lifetime cap of $500) for Qualified Energy-Efficient Home Improvements (e.g., qualified energy-efficient windows, storm doors, roofing). As we send this letter, it has been reported that some members of Congress are still pushing for these tax breaks to be extended beyond 2020. However, only time will tell whether these tax breaks will be extended. Please call our office if you would like a status report on any of these expiring provisions. Planning Alert! Although not expiring, the credit for “Qualified Fuel Cell Property,” “Qualified Small Wind Energy Property,” “Qualified Solar Electric Property,” “Qualified Solar Water Heating Property,” And “Qualified Geothermal Heat Pump Property” is to be reduced from 26% to 22% for property installed after 2020. Also, for “2020 only,” volunteer firefighters and volunteer EMS personnel may exclude from income up to $50 per month of expense reimbursements made by the State or political subdivision.

HIGHLIGHTS OF RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

In late December, 2019, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020 (the “Appropriations Act”) which pre-dated the more recent flurry of COVID-related legislation. The Appropriations Act included significant changes to various IRA and qualified retirement plan rules. Most of these changes are first effective in 2020. In addition, the more recently-enacted “CARES Act” provided temporary relief relating to Required Minimum Distributions from IRAs and qualified retirement plans. The following are highlights of selected changes from both of those pieces of legislation that we feel will have the greatest impact on tax planning for individuals:

Required Beginning Date For Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) Delayed To Age 72. Before this change, you were required to begin taking “Required Minimum Distributions” (RMDs) from your IRA or qualified retirement plan account no later than the April 1st following the year you reached age 70½ (i.e., the required beginning date). For individuals who reach age 70½ after 2019, the Appropriations Act changed the age of the required beginning date for RMDs from 70½ to age 72. So, if you reach age 70½ after 2019, you will not be required to take your first RMD until April 1st following the year in which you reach age 72!  Planning Alert! Individuals who reached age 70½ during 2019 were still generally required to take their first RMD no later than April 1st of 2020, and were also required to take their second RMD no later than December 31, 2020. However, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief And Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) suspended all RMDs from an IRA or employer-sponsored defined contribution retirement plan that are otherwise required in 2020. This suspension applies to owners of IRAs and beneficiaries of inherited IRAs. Tax Tip! An RMD generally may not be rolled over into another IRA or qualified retirement plan. However, the IRS says that an individual who actually received an RMD during 2020, may roll over that RMD into an IRA or qualified retirement plan provided the rollover occurred by the later of: 1) August 31, 2020, or 2) 60 days after the receipt of the RMD.

Age Limit On Contributing To An IRA Removed. Before 2020, an individual who reached age 70½ during the year could not contribute to a traditional IRA for that year, or any later year. For contributions made for tax years beginning after 2019, the Appropriations Act removed all age limits for contributing to an IRA. Stated more simply, for contributions made for tax years beginning after 2019, there is no age limit on contributions to a traditional or Roth IRA! Planning Alert! Regardless of your age, you must have “earned income” (e.g., W-2 wages; Income subject to self-employment tax) at least equal to the amount of your contribution to a traditional or Roth IRA. Caution! As discussed in the immediately-following segment, making a deductible contribution to your IRA after reaching age 70½ could have a negative tax impact on any “Qualified Charitable Distributions” you are planning to make from your IRA.

Changes To “Qualified Charitable Distributions” (QCDs) For IRA Owners. If you have reached age 70½ and you are planning to make charitable contributions before the end of 2020, there is a long-standing tax break known as a “Qualified Charitable Distribution” (QCD) that could apply to you. This popular provision generally allows taxpayers, who have reached age 70½, to have their IRA trustee transfer up to $100,000

from their IRAs “directly” to a qualified charity, and exclude the IRA transfer from income. The IRA transfer to the charity also counts toward the IRA owner’s “Required Minimum Distributions” (RMDs) for the year. Changes Under The Appropriations Act. Although the Appropriations Act increased the required beginning date for RMDs from age 70½ to age 72, the minimum age for making a QCD remains at age 70½. But beware, starting in 2020, the Appropriations Act generally reduces the tax-free portion of a QCD by the amount of any deductible contributions made to an IRA after reaching age 70½. If you are planning to make a QCD for 2020 and you also plan to make a deductible IRA contribution for 2020, please call our firm first. We will gladly advise you on the impact of this new rule on your decision.

New 10-Year Pay-Out Requirement For Those Who Inherit An IRA Or Qualified Plan Account. If an individual died before 2020 and someone other than the surviving spouse was named as the beneficiary of the decedent’s IRA or qualified plan account, RMDs to the named beneficiary were required to begin by December 31 of the year following the year of death, and could be paid over the life expectancy of the named beneficiary. For example, if an individual died in 2019 and a child (regardless of age) was the beneficiary of the individual’s IRA, the child could take RMDs over the child’s life expectancy. Planning Alert! Effective for individuals dying after 2019, the Appropriations Act generally requires a decedent’s entire remaining IRA or qualified account balance to be distributed to a named beneficiary by December 31 of the 10th year following the year of the decedent’s death. This required 10-year pay out does not apply if the named beneficiary is the decedent’s spouse, has a qualified disability, is chronically ill, or is no more than 10 years younger than the decedent. If the named beneficiary is a minor, the 10-year pay-out requirement does not kick in until the beneficiary reaches majority (age 18 in many jurisdictions).

• Planning For Rollovers By Surviving The new 10-year payout requirement does not apply to a surviving spouse who is the named beneficiary of the decedent’s IRA or qualified retirement plan. In that event, the surviving spouse would generally treat the IRA as an “inherited” IRA and be required to take RMDs over the surviving spouse’s “single life expectancy” (with no 10-year pay out requirement). However, it is generally advisable for the surviving spouse to convert the decedent’s IRA into the name of the surviving spouse (i.e., convert it into a “spousal IRA”). This is generally advisable because, once the decedent’s IRA is converted to a spousal IRA: 1) The surviving spouse will not be required to begin taking RMDs until the April 1stfollowing the year the surviving spouse reaches age 72, and 2) When the RMDs begin, the surviving spouse’s RMDs will be determined using the “Uniform Lifetime Distributions Table” (with no 10-year pay out requirement), which will result in a smaller annual required payout than under the “single life expectancy” computation that would otherwise be required had the surviving spouse not converted the decedent’s IRA into a spousal IRA.

For Some - 2020 May Be A Good Year To Consider A Roth Conversion. If you have been considering converting your traditional IRA into a Roth IRA, it is best to convert in a low income year so your Roth conversion income is taxed at the lower tax rates. Therefore, if you are in a situation where, due to COVID (or for any other reason), your 2020 income is significantly lower than the income you expect in 2021 and later years, it may be a good idea to consider converting all or a portion of your traditional IRA into a Roth IRA before the end of 2020. Planning Alert! If you want a Roth conversion to be effective for 2020, you must transfer the amount from the regular IRA to the Roth IRA no later than December 31, 2020 (you do not have until the due date of your 2020 tax return).Caution! Whether you should convert your traditional IRA to a Roth IRA can be an exceedingly complicated issue. Your tax rate in the year of conversion is just one of many factors that you should consider. Please call our Firm if you need help in deciding whether to convert to a Roth IRA.

Economic Impact Payments. By now, the vast majority of individuals qualifying for an “economic impact payment” (EIP) under the CARES Act of up to $1,200 per qualifying individual (and $500 per qualifying dependent) have received the payment. If you haven’t received the payment (or you think your payment was less than it should have been), you can obtain detailed information on economic impact payments at  www.irs.gov by accessing the link - “Economic Impact Payment Information Center: EIP Eligibility and General Information.” Planning Alert! Technically, the EIP is an advance payment of a 2020 refundable tax credit. A “refundable” credit generally means to the extent the credit exceeds the taxes you would otherwise owe with your individual income tax return without the credit, the IRS will send you a check for the excess. If for some reason you did not get the EIP (or the amount you received was too low), the credit will be re- computed when you file your 2020 income tax return based on your 2020 AGI. You will be entitled to a refundable credit for the amount of the credit computed on your 2020 income tax return in excess (if any) of the advance payment you previously received. If the credit computed on your 2020 return is less than the EIP you received, generally you will not have to pay back the excess.

Temporary “Above-The-Line” Deduction Of Up To $300 For Charitable Contributions For Individuals Who Do Not Itemize Deductions. For the 2020 tax year only, the CARES Act allows individuals who do not elect to itemize their deductions, to take a so-called “above-the-line” deduction of up to $300 for cash contributions to a qualifying charity. Therefore, an individual may deduct this $300 amount in addition to the standard deduction for 2020. Caution! Contributions to a donor advised fund do not qualify for this special “above-the-line” deduction.

Temporary Increase In Charitable Contribution Limit For Individuals Who Do Itemized Deductions. Traditionally, for those who itemize their deductions, the deduction for charitable contributions made in cash to qualifying charities has been limited to 60% (through 2025) of an individual’s adjusted gross income (AGI), and to 30% of AGI for certain “property” contributions. For the 2020 tax year only, the CARES Act allows an individual to deduct “cash” contributions to qualifying charities up to 100% of the individual’s AGI (as reduced by the amount of all other charitable contributions allowed to the individual under the traditional charitable contribution limits). Caution! A qualifying charity does not include a donor-advised fund.

HIGHLIGHTS OF TRADITIONAL YEAR-END TAX PLANNING TECHNIQUES

Pay Special Attention To “Timing” Issues! From a tax-planning standpoint, 2020 has been anything but a “normal” year for most. The pandemic has caused many individuals to incur significant losses in income. While at the same time, some individuals have actually experienced an increase in their expected income during this difficult time. Consequently, for 2020, there is clearly no single year-end tax planning strategy that will necessarily apply to all (or even a majority) of individuals.

In normal times, a traditional year-end tax planning strategy would include reducing your current year taxable income by deferring taxable income into later years and accelerating deductions into the current year. This strategy is particularly beneficial where your income tax rate in the following year is expected to be the same or lower than the current year. Consequently, in the following discussion we include traditional year-end tax planning strategies that would allow you to accelerate your deductions into 2020, while deferring your income into 2021. Caution! For individuals who expect their taxable income to be much lower in 2020 than in 2021, the opposite strategy might be more advisable. That is, for individuals who have experienced a significant drop in income during 2020, a better year-end planning strategy might include accelerating income into 2020 (to be taxed at lower rates), while deferring deductions to 2021 (to be taken against income that is expected to be taxed at higher rates). As we discuss the planning methods that involve the “timing” of income or deductions, please keep in mind that you might want to consider taking the precise opposite steps recommended if you decide it would be better to defer deductions into 2021, while accelerating income into 2020.

Taking Advantage Of “Above-The Line” Deductions. Traditional year-end planning includes accelerating deductible expenses into the current tax year. So-called “above-the-line” deductions reduce both your “adjusted gross income” (AGI) and your “modified adjusted gross income” (MAGI), while “itemized” deductions (i.e., below-the-line deductions) do not reduce either AGI or MAGI. Deductions that reduce your AGI (or MAGI) can generate multiple tax benefits by: 1) Reducing your taxable income and allowing you to be taxed in a lower tax bracket; 2) Potentially freeing up other deductions (and tax credits) that phase out as your AGI (or MAGI) increases (e.g., Certain IRA Contributions, Certain Education Credits, Adoption Credit, Child and Family Tax Credits, etc.); 3) Potentially reducing your MAGI below the income thresholds for the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (i.e., 3.8% NIIT only applies if MAGI exceeds $250,000 if married filing jointly; $200,000 if single); or 4) Possibly reducing your household income to a level that allows you to qualify for a “refundable” Premium Tax Credit for health insurance purchased on a government Exchange. Planning Alert! In addition, individuals reporting Qualified Business Income will generally find it much easier to qualify for the new 20% 199A Deduction with respect to that Qualified Business Income if their 2020 taxable income does not exceed $326,600 if filing a joint return or $163,300 if single. So, if you think that you could benefit from accelerating “above-the-line” deductions into 2020, consider the following:

• Identifying “Above-The-Line” “Above-the-line” deductions include: Deductions for IRA or Health Savings Account (HSA) Contributions; Health Insurance Premiums for Self-Employed Individuals; Qualified Student Loan Interest; Qualifying Alimony Payments (if the divorce or separation instrument was executed before 2019); and, Business Expenses for a Self-Employed Individual. Caution! Un-reimbursed employee business expenses are not deductible at all for 2018 through 2025.

However, employee business expenses that are reimbursed under an employer’s accountable plan are excluded altogether from the employee’s taxable income.

• Accelerating “Above-The-Line” As a cash method taxpayer, you can generally accelerate a 2021 deduction into 2020 by “paying” it in 2020. “Payment” typically occurs in 2020 if, before the end of 2020: 1) A check is delivered to the post office, 2) Your electronic payment is debited to your account, or 3) An item is charged on a third-party credit card (e.g., Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express). Caution! If you post-date the check to 2021 or if your check is rejected, no payment has been made in 2020 even if the check is delivered in 2020. Planning Alert! The IRS says that prepayments of expenses applicable to periods beyond 12 months after the payments are not deductible in 2020.

“Itemized” Deductions. Although “itemized” deductions (i.e., below-the-line deductions) do not reduce your AGI or MAGI, they still may provide valuable tax savings. Starting in 2018 and through 2025, recent legislation substantially increased the Standard Deduction. For 2020, the Standard Deduction is: Joint Return

- $24,800; Single - $12,400; and Head-of-Household - $18,650. Planning Alert! If you think your itemized deductions this year could likely exceed your Standard Deduction of $24,800 if filing jointly ($12,400 if single), consider the following:

• Accelerating Charitable Contributions Into If you want to accelerate your charitable deduction into 2020, please note that a charitable contribution deduction is allowed for 2020 if the check is “mailed” on or before December 31, 2020, or the contribution is made by a credit card charge in 2020. However, if you merely give a note or a pledge to a charity, no deduction is allowed until you pay the note or pledge. Caution! As discussed previously, for 2020 only, the CARES Act allows a taxpayer to deduct charitable contributions of up to 100% of the individual’s AGI if made in “cash.” Contributions of “property” (e.g., stock, real estate) do not qualify for this temporary 100% of AGI rule.

• Medical Expense If you think your itemized deductions this year could likely exceed your standard deduction of $24,800 if filing jointly ($12,400 if single), but you do not expect your itemized deductions to exceed your Standard Deduction next year, you could save taxes in the long run by accelerating elective medical expenses (e.g., braces, new eye glasses, etc.) into 2020. Planning Alert! For 2020, you are allowed to take a medical expense itemized deduction only to the extent your aggregate medical expenses exceed 7.5% of your AGI. This 7.5% threshold is scheduled to increase to 10% after 2020.

• $10,000 Cap On State And Local From 2018 through 2025, your aggregate itemized deduction for state and local real property taxes, state and local personal property taxes, and state and local income taxes (or sales taxes if elected) is limited to $10,000 ($5,000 for married filing separately).

• Limitations On The Deduction For Interest Paid On Home Mortgage “Acquisition ” Before the Tax Cuts And Jobs Act (TCJA), individuals were generally allowed an itemized deduction for home mortgage interest paid on up to $1,000,000 ($500,000 for married individuals filing separately) of “Acquisition Indebtedness” (i.e., funds borrowed to purchase, construct, or substantially improve your principal or second residence and secured by that residence). Subject to certain transition rules, TCJA reduced the dollar cap for Acquisition Indebtedness incurred after December 15, 2017 from

$1,000,000 to $750,000 ($375,000 for married filing separately) for 2018 through 2025. Planning Alert! If you think your itemized deductions this year could likely exceed your Standard Deduction, paying your January, 2021 qualifying home mortgage payment before 2021 should shift the deduction for any qualifying interest portion of that payment into 2020.

• “Home Equity Indebtedness” Suspended For 2018 through TCJA suspended the deduction for interest with respect to “Home Equity Indebtedness” (i.e., up to $100,000 of funds borrowed that do not qualify as “Acquisition Indebtedness” but are secured by your principal or second residence). Caution! Unlike the interest deduction for “Acquisition Indebtedness,” TCJA did not grandfather any interest deduction for “Home Equity Indebtedness” that was outstanding before 2018.

Postponing Taxable Income May Save Taxes. Generally, deferring taxable income from 2020 to 2021 may also reduce your income taxes, particularly if your effective income tax rate for 2021 will be lower than your effective income tax rate for 2020.

• Planning For Tax The deferral of income could cause your 2020 taxable income to fall below the thresholds for the highest 37% tax bracket (i.e., $622,050 for joint returns; $518,400 if single). In addition, if you have income subject to the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (3.8% NIIT) and the income deferral reduces your 2020 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below the thresholds for the 3.8% NIIT (i.e.,

$250,000 for joint returns; $200,000 if single), you may avoid this additional 3.8% tax on your investment income.

• Deferring Self-Employment If you are a self-employed individual using the cash method of accounting, consider delaying year-end billings to defer income until 2021. Planning Alert! If you have already received the check in 2020, deferring the deposit of the check does not defer the income. Also, you may not want to defer billing if you believe this will increase your risk of not getting paid.

Traditional Year-End Planning With Capital Gains And Losses. Generally, net capital gains (both short- term and long-term) are potentially subject to the 3.8% NIIT. This could result in an individual filing a joint return with taxable income for 2020 of $496,600 or more ($441,450 or more if single) paying tax on his or her net long-term capital gains at a 23.8% rate (i.e., the maximum capital gains tax rate of 20% plus the 3.8% NIIT). In addition, this individual’s net short-term capital gains could be taxed as high as 40.8% (i.e., 37% plus 3.8%). Consequently, traditional planning strategies involving the timing of your year-end sales of stocks, bonds, or other securities continue to be as important as ever. The following are time-tested, year-end tax planning ideas for sales of capital assets. Planning Alert! Always consider the economics of a sale or exchange first!

• Planning With Zero Percent Tax Rate For Capital Gains And For individuals filing a joint return with 2020 Taxable Income of less than $80,000 (less than $40,000 if single), their long-term capital gains and qualified dividends are taxed at a zero percent rate. Tax Tip. Individuals who have historically been in higher tax brackets but are now expecting a significant drop in their 2020 taxable income, may find themselves in the zero percent tax bracket for long-term capital gains and qualified dividends for the first time. For example, a significant drop in 2020 taxable income could have occurred due to COVID-19; or because you are between jobs; or you recently retired; or you are expecting to report higher-than-normal business deductions in 2020. Planning Alert! If you are experiencing any of these situations, please call our Firm as soon as possible and we will help you determine whether you can take advantage of this zero percent tax rate for long-term capital gains and qualified dividends. If you wait too late to contact us, you may run out of time before the end of this year to take the recommended steps to maximize your tax savings.

• Timing Your Capital Gains And If the value of some of your investments is less than your cost, it may be a good time to harvest some capital losses. For example, if you have already recognized capital gains in 2020, you should consider selling securities prior to January 1, 2021 that would trigger a capital loss. These losses will be deductible on your 2020 return to the extent of your recognized capital gains, plus $3,000. Tax Tip. These losses may have the added benefit of reducing your income to a level that will qualify you for other tax breaks, such as: 1) The $2,500 American Opportunity Tax Credit, 2) The

$2,000 Child Tax Credit, 3) The Adoption Credit of $14,300, or 4) Causing your taxable income to drop below the $326,600/$163,300 thresholds for purposes of the 20% 199A Deduction (previously mentioned).  Planning Alert! If, within 30 days before or after the sale of loss securities, you acquire the same securities, the loss will not be allowed currently because of the “wash sale” rules (although the disallowed loss will increase the basis of the acquired stock). Tax Tip. There is no wash sale rule for gains. Thus, if you decide to sell stock at a gain in order to take advantage of a zero capital gains rate, or to absorb capital losses, you may acquire the same securities within 30 days without impacting the recognition of the gain.

The “Premium Tax Credit” Under The Affordable Care Act. Although TCJA essentially eliminated the penalty for individuals who fail to purchase qualified health coverage by reducing the “Shared Responsibility Tax” (SR Tax) to Zero, it did not repeal the refundable “Premium Tax Credit” or “PTC.” The PTC is still generally available for eligible low-and-middle income individuals who purchase health insurance through a State or Federal Exchange. The PTC is generally paid in advance directly to the insurer (“Advance Payments”). Any individual who received Advance Payments for 2020 is required to file a 2020 income tax return to reconcile: 1) The amount of the “actual” PTC (based on the individual’s “actual” 2020 Household Income), with 2) The Advance Payments of the PTC (which were determined by the Exchange based on the individual’s “projected” 2020 Household Income). Caution! If an individual’s Advance Payments for 2020

exceed the “actual” PTC, the excess must be paid back on the 2020 tax return as an “additional tax liability.”

• Possible Cap On The Amount That Must Be Paid Back! The amount of the 2020 excess payment that must be repaid as an additional tax liability is capped if the individual’s actual 2020 Household Income is less than 400% of the Federal Poverty Line (FPL) for the individual’s family For example, for 2020, as long as an individual’s actual household income is less than 400% of the FPL, the maximum amount that must be repaid will not exceed $1,350 for a single individual and $2,700 for others. Planning Alert! In some cases, an individual whose “actual” 2020 Household Income is projected to be 400% or more of the FPL may be able to trigger these dollar caps by reducing his or her “actual” 2020 Household Income below 400% of the FPL. For example, an individual might make a contribution to an IRA (if eligible to do so) in order to reduce his or her 2020 Household Income to less than 400% of the 2020 FPL for the individual’s family size. Taking this step would cap the amount of the individual’s excess payments required to be paid back as an additional tax liability to $1,350 for single individuals and

$2,700 for others. Tax Tip! If you think that you may have to pay back some or all of your 2020 excess payments, please call our Firm as soon as possible so we can determine whether you can take steps before the end of 2020 to minimize the amount of the pay back.

FINAL COMMENTS

Please contact us if you are interested in a tax topic that we did not discuss. Tax law is constantly changing due to new legislation, cases, regulations, and IRS rulings. Our Firm closely monitors these changes. In addition, please call us before implementing any planning ideas discussed in this letter, or if you need additional information. Note! The information contained in this material should not be relied upon without an independent, professional analysis of how any of the items discussed may apply to a specific situation.

Disclaimer: Any tax advice contained in the body of this material was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. The preceding information is intended as a general discussion of the subject addressed and is not intended as a formal tax opinion. The recipient should not rely on any information contained herein without performing his or her own research verifying the conclusions reached. The conclusions reached should not be relied upon without an independent, professional analysis of the facts and law applicable to the situation.